Switching Mechanisms in Hybrid Job Design: A Case Study of a CEO in an Indonesian Household Equipment Manufacturing Company
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71094/vkj.v3i3.184Keywords:
Switching Mechanisms, Hybrid Job Design, Standardization, Flexibility, Manufacturing Ceo, Case StudyAbstract
This study aims to explore in depth the switching mechanisms implemented by a CEO of an Indonesian household equipment manufacturing company to balance the competing demands of standardization and flexibility in job design. A qualitative approach with an instrumental single-case study design was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with the CEO, limited participant observation on the production floor over three days, and analysis of corporate documents. Data analysis utilized the Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) framework. The research identified three primary switching mechanisms implemented: (1) a daily mode-switching protocol based on production line status, (2) a trigger-based escalation matrix for handling deviations, and (3) a post-mortem learning loop that integrates experiential learning into procedural updates. Findings indicate that successful switching implementation is critically dependent on systematic investment in developing worker capacity through cross-skilling and fostering a culture of psychological safety. The novelty of this research lies in being the first empirical study to document in detail the implementation of switching mechanisms within hybrid job design in the Indonesian manufacturing context.
Downloads
References
Arya, S. (2025). True test for manufacturing CEOs: How many careers they catalyse. Cummins India Leadership Insights.
Ballé, M., Bennett, D., & Handlinger, P. (2014). What's senior leaders' standard work in a lean enterprise? Planet Lean. https://www.planet-lean.com/articles/standard-work-senior-leadership
Deloitte. (2024). India CEO Outlook 2024. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India LLP.
Egon Zehnder. (2024). The evolution of the manufacturing CEO. Egon Zehnder & Manufacturers Alliance Foundation.
Fang, Y., Daniel, E. I., & Li, S. (2021). Conceptual framework for lean construction ambidexterity in project-based organisations. Construction Management and Economics, 39(10), 824-838. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.1978516
Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40(2), 287-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00605.x
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
HRD Asia. (2025, October 9). 'People development is not a department's job. It's the company's top priority'. HRD America. https://www.hcamag.com/asia/specialisation/employee-engagement/people-development-is-not-a-departments-job-its-the-companys-top-priority/552554
Ihnen, D., & Busse, D. (2026). Stable and agile all at once. Fraunhofer IPK Research. https://www.ipk.fraunhofer.de/en/expertise-and-technologies/industry-trends/manufacturing-systems-and-production-control/stable-and-agile-all-at-once.html
Jensen, D. (2026). It's time for mass customization to reach HR. Smith Business Insight, Queen's University. https://smith.queensu.ca/insight/content/Its-Time-for-Mass-Customization-to-Reach-HR.php
Liker, J. K., Collins, P. D., & Hull, F. M. (1999). Flexibility and standardization: Test of a contingency model of product design-manufacturing integration. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(3), 248-267. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1630248
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Peters, P., & Lam, W. (2015). Can employability do the trick? Revealing paradoxical tensions and responses in the process of adopting innovative employability-enhancing policies and practices in organizations. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(3-4), 235-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/239700221558729
Petrou, P., Bakker, A. B., & van den Heuvel, M. (2017). Weekly job crafting and leisure crafting: Implications for meaning-making and work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(2), 129-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12160
Randall, J. (2026). Not your father's factory: Flexibility, even on the shop floor. Hitachi Industrial Equipment Systems Insights. https://insights.hitachi-ies.com/_ct/17770118
Santo, J. (2026). Lessons from executive leaders: Build systems that drive operational excellence. Ease.io Blog. https://www.ease.io/blog/lessons-from-executive-leaders/
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage Publications.
te Kaat, V., & Korsgaard, D. (2024). Job crafting to improve low-usability automation: Sustainability through human work interaction designs. In A. Bramwell-Dicks, A. Evans, M. Winckler, H. Petrie, & J. Abdelnour-Nocera (Eds.), Design for equality and justice: INTERACT 2023 IFIP TC 13 workshops (pp. 377-387). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61688-4_36
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Tims, M., Derks, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2016). Job crafting and its relationships with person-job fit and meaningfulness: A three-wave study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.007
World Economic Forum. (2025). The Future of Jobs Report 2025. WEF. https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_Report_2025.pdf
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378011
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Young, S. M., Anderson, S. W., & Young, S. (1995). Assessing the organizational fit of a just-in-time manufacturing system: Testing selection, interaction and systems models of contingency theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(7-8), 665-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(95)00022-2
Zero100. (2025). The org shape of the future isn't flat or tall - and it calls for a new type of leadership. Zero100 Research.
Zhang, M., & Xu, Q. (2013). The impact of new product & operations technological practices on organization structure. International Journal of Production Economics, 145(2), 497-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.023
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dewa Putu Yohanes Agata L. Sandopart

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












