Analisis Kebutuhan Video Pembelajaran Animasi Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa SD

Ruslan Effendi Kilkoda; Adiati Tomia; Intan Gemelia Fau; Wirda Wiwik La Otje; Nurhikmah H; Abdul Hakim

doi:10.71094/vkj.v4i1.235

Authors

Ruslan Effendi Kilkoda Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan,Universitas Negeri Makassar,Indonesia
Adiati Tomia Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan,Universitas Negeri Makassar,Indonesia
Intan Gemelia Fau Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan,Universitas Negeri Makassar,Indonesia
Wirda Wiwik La Otje Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan,Universitas Negeri Makassar,Indonesia
Nurhikmah H Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan,Universitas Negeri Makassar,Indonesia
Abdul Hakim Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan,Universitas Negeri Makassar,Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71094/vkj.v4i1.235

Keywords:

Animated Learning Video, Conceptual Understanding, Elementary School Students, Learning Media, Validity, Practicality

Abstract

This study aims to develop and evaluate the quality of an animated learning video as an instructional medium to improve elementary school students’ conceptual understanding. The study focuses on examining the validity and practicality of the developed animated learning video. A descriptive quantitative approach was employed, involving elementary school teachers and students as research subjects. Data were collected through a closed-ended questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale and analyzed descriptively with the assistance of Microsoft Excel. The results indicate that the animated learning video has a high level of validity in terms of the appropriateness of the content, presentation, language, and visual design in relation to the learning objectives and the characteristics of elementary school students. The practicality of the media also received positive responses from both teachers and students, particularly regarding ease of use, visual appeal, clarity of material presentation, and the benefits of the media in supporting conceptual understanding. Based on these findings, the animated learning video is considered feasible for use as an instructional medium. It can serve as an engaging, interactive, and age-appropriate learning alternative to support elementary school students in developing conceptual understanding more effectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brünken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_7

Cavanagh, T. M., & Kiersch, C. (2023). Using commonly-available technologies to create online multimedia lessons through the application of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 1033–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10181-1

Çeken, B., & Taşkın, N. (2022). Multimedia learning principles in different learning environments: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 9, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00200-2

Cennamo, K. S. (1993). Learning from video: Factors influencing learners' preconceptions and invested mental effort. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297356

Cheng, C., Wu, Y., Wang, R., et al. (2026). Seductive details, cognitive load, and learning outcomes: A multi-level meta-analysis and MASEM. Educational Psychology Review, 38, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10099-z

Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction: An example of the two-way street between cognition and instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(89), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.47

Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63(8), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760

Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1

Mayer, R. E., & Johnson, C. I. (2008). Revising the redundancy principle in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.380

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.312

Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.389

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.117

Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.319

Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Video improves learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 204–236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321990713

Oberfoell, A., & Correia, A. (2016). Understanding the role of the modality principle in multimedia learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12157

Rey, G. D., & Steib, N. (2013). The personalization effect in multimedia learning: The influence of dialect. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2641–2647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.003

Ryanda, E., & Khoiri, A. (2026). Animated video learning improves elementary students electrical circuit understanding. Academia Open, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.11.2026.13826

Wang, Z., Sundararajan, N., Adesope, O. O., & Ardasheva, Y. (2017). Moderating the seductive details effect in multimedia learning with note-taking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1380–1389. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12476

Widianti, M., Gusfantoni, N. T. E., & Oktasari, W. (2026). Efektivitas pembelajaran berbasis video animasi dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep IPS di sekolah dasar: Sebuah kajian literatur. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.46131

Yue, C., Kim, J., Ogawa, R., Stark, E., & Kim, S. (2013). Applying the cognitive theory of multimedia learning: An analysis of medical animations. Medical Education, 47(4), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12090