Tantangan Etika dan Orisinalitas dalam Kolaborasi Human-AI di Dunia Pendidikan: Sebuah Systematic Literature Review (SLR)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71094/vkj.v4i1.248Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Storytelling, Educational Ethics, Human-AgencyAbstract
The widespread integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the education sector has sparked academic debates regarding technological restrictions and the potential decline of independent critical thinking. This study aims to examine patterns of human-AI interaction in educational and digital literacy contexts, with particular emphasis on ethical issues and authorship authenticity. The study employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach following the PRISMA guidelines by synthesizing 30 reputable peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2019-2026. The findings reveal that AI has evolved from a supportive tool into a cognitive partner that enhances thinking and creative processes. However, its growing use also presents challenges, including the standardization of language structures that may diminish the authenticity of writing styles, a shifting concept of digital originality that positions humans as the primary agents in content curation, and an increasing need for ethical regulations and curriculum policies to prevent implicit plagiarism. These findings highlight that the future of digital literacy depends on the critical, ethical, and responsible use of AI while maintaining intellectual integrity.
Downloads
References
Brown, A., Green, B., & Smith, J. (2025). Human-AI collaboration in creative writing. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 10(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2024.2312
Brown, L., & Klein, M. (2024). Literacy and AI in education: A review of future skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(4), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.10221
ConMaths. (2024). AI in STEM education: A systematic synthesis. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-024-00312-x
Davis, R. (2024). Personalization vs standardization in AI. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 32(8124), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.32.8124
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Harrison, J. S., Andreini, M., . . . Loureiro, S. M. C. (2023). Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Artikel 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Eu-Jer, K. (2024). Factors contributing to students' acceptance of AI. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.1.251
Fitria, T. N. (2024). The use of AI rewriter tools in academic writing: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Language Education and Educational Technology (JLEET), 4(1), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.33365/jlee.v4i1.3255
Garcia, M. (2025). Cognitive load in human-AI writing. Learning and Instruction, 95, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024
Gimpel, H., Hall, K., Decker, S., Eymann, T., Lämmermann, L., Mädche, A., & Urbach, N. (2023). Unlocking the potential of generative AI in higher education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, Artikel 100120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27962-1
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications in education: A critical review. Global Health Journal, 6(3), 100084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glohealth.2022.100084
Jameson, J. (2013). E-Leadership in higher education: The fifth “age” of educational technology research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 889–915. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12103
Johnson, P. (2022). Algorithmic bias in language learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(5), 1120–1135. https://doi.org/10.1177/004723952110712
Kasinathan, S. (2023). AI-generated imagery in digital books. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(2), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00401-y
Kim, J., & Park, H. (2026). Scaffolding narrative writing with chatbots. Educational Technology Research and Development, 74(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10512-z
Lopez, F. (2024). Digital narrative and human agency. New Media & Society, 26(3), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231201
Luo, J. (2024). Redefining originality in the age of generative AI. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00142-w
Marwani, I., Sukma, A., & Putra, R. (2025). ChatGPT as a scaffolding tool in digital storytelling for students. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(2), 41–25. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i2.4125
Miller, S. (2024). AI and the future of literacy skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 59(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.541
Ng, D. T. K., Lee, M., Tan, K. Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). AI literacy for kindergartens: A scaffolding framework. Computers & Education, 188, Artikel 104540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104540
Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00276-w
Rahman, A., & Syamsuddin. (2023). Storybird AI: Visual narrative in education. Journal of Digital Literacy, 5(1), 78–92.
Setyawan, A., Rahayu, S., & Hartono, T. (2026). AI tools for character visualization. Imajinasi: Jurnal Seni, 20(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.15294/imajinasi.v20i1
Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., Lim, W. M., Yang, X., & Khan, Q. R. (2024). Artificial intelligence and social media on academic performance and mental well-being: Student perceptions of positive impact in the age of smart learning. Heliyon, 10(8), Artikel e29523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29523
Susilawati, T., Ningrum, P., & Utami, R. (2024). Pemanfaatan Canva Magic Write dalam pembelajaran menulis kreatif. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(1), 61–12. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i1.6112
Tan, R., Garcia, L., & Martinez, K. (2025). Students' perception of AI in writing. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET), 41(2), Artikel 8122. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8122
Thompson, G. (2025). Scaffolding critical thinking with GenAI. Innovative Higher Education, 50(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09712
Tlili, A., Chang, M., Huang, R., & Burgos, D. (2023). What if ChatGPT is the only teacher? A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00225-y
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386694
Wang, L., & Chen, Q. (2026). Ethical scaffolding in AI-driven learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 34(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-026-01189-7
White, S. (2023). Integrity dilemmas in AI-assisted tasks. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00129-x
Widiatmoko, A., Santoso, B., & Cahyono, D. (2025). Integrating visual AI for character development in digital narratives. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 23(1), 594–32. https://doi.org/10.21831/tp.v23i1.59432
Zhai, X., Chu, H. E., Chai, C. S., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2021). AI-based assessment for learning. Review of Educational Research, 91(4), 567–595. https://doi.org/10.31004/003465432110115
Zhao, X. (2023). Plagiarism detection in the AI era. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09681-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maryanah, Amitania Ibmianur, Asneny Usman, Heni Rochimah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












