Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Menulis Teks Prosedur Bermuatan Kearifan Lokal Mandailing untuk Siswa Kelas XI SMK Kesehatan Imelda Ritonga

Authors

  • Uci Rahmadhani Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Muharrina Harahap Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Fitriani Lubis Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71094/vkj.v3i4.273

Keywords:

Instructional Materials, Procedural Text Writing, Mandailing Local Wisdom, ADDIE, Indonesian Language Learning

Abstract

This study aims to develop instructional materials for writing procedural texts based on Mandailing local wisdom for eleventh-grade students at Imelda Ritonga Health Vocational High School and to examine their feasibility, practicality, and effectiveness in Indonesian language learning. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model, which consists of the stages of Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. Data were collected through observations, interviews, questionnaires, expert validation, and learning achievement tests. The research participants included a subject-matter expert, an instructional design expert, an Indonesian language teacher, and eleventh-grade students. The product developed was a procedural text writing module that integrates Mandailing local wisdom through the context of preparing the traditional food Itak Poul-Poul. The validation results indicated that the instructional materials were categorized as highly feasible, with an average score of 91.5%. The practicality test showed very positive responses from both teachers and students, with an average percentage of 92%. Furthermore, the effectiveness test revealed an improvement in students’ learning outcomes, as demonstrated by an increase in the average score from 68.40 on the pretest to 85.70 on the posttest. These findings indicate that the developed instructional materials can enhance students’ procedural text writing skills while introducing local cultural values. Therefore, the instructional materials are considered valid, practical, and effective, and they have the potential to support the preservation of local culture through education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aisyah, N., Abdullah, R., & Sari, P. (2020). Pengaruh penggunaan bahan ajar terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 5(1), 60–68.

Alshammari, M. T. (2021). Evaluation of gamification in EFL classrooms: Student motivation and engagement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(5), 789–798.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2019). Teaching for quality learning at university (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Billett, S. (2020). Learning through work: Workplace affordances and individual engagement. Springer.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140.

Densi, A., Lestari, N., & Puspita, R. (2023). Pengembangan bahan ajar berbasis kebutuhan peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 11(4), 720–730.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson.

Gay, G. (2021). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Harahap, R. (2020). Kuliner tradisional Mandailing sebagai identitas budaya masyarakat. Jurnal Antropologi Nusantara, 2(1), 40–48.

Hattie, J. (2020). Visible learning: The sequel. Routledge.

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2020). The four-phase model of interest development. In K. A. Renninger & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning (pp. 111–127). Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2022). Teaching and researching writing (4th ed.). Routledge.

Johariyah. (2022). Pengembangan bahan ajar berbasis pendekatan saintifik untuk meningkatkan kemampuan menulis narasi. Metafora: Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra, 8(2), 101–112.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Capaian pembelajaran jenjang SMK. Kemendikbudristek.

Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 125–135). Springer.

Nurul, H., Wulandari, S., & Rahmawati, D. (2022). Pengembangan bahan bacaan teks eksplanasi berbasis potensi lokal. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(1), 55–62.

Ormrod, J. E. (2020). Human learning (8th ed.). Pearson.

Prastowo, A. (2015). Pengembangan bahan ajar tematik. Kencana.

Prilia, S., Irianto, S., & Sriyanto. (2023). Pengembangan bahan ajar tematik berbasis kompetensi peserta didik dalam rangka memenuhi tuntutan pembelajaran abad ke-21. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 14(2), 115–130.

Septiaji, A. (2020). Keterampilan menulis dalam perspektif pembelajaran modern. Pustaka Cendekia.

Sibarani, R. (2020). Kearifan lokal: Hakikat, peran, dan metode tradisi lisan. Asosiasi Tradisi Lisan.

Sibarani, R. (2021). Pendekatan kearifan lokal dalam pendidikan karakter. Asosiasi Tradisi Lisan.

Tomlinson, B. (2020). Developing materials for language teaching (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

Walqui, A., & van Lier, L. (2020). Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners: A pedagogy of promise. WestEd.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Rahmadhani, U., Harahap, M., & Lubis, F. (2026). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Menulis Teks Prosedur Bermuatan Kearifan Lokal Mandailing untuk Siswa Kelas XI SMK Kesehatan Imelda Ritonga. Varied Knowledge Journal, 3(4), 760–770. https://doi.org/10.71094/vkj.v3i4.273