A Systematic Literature Review of Motivation in Physics Education

Authors

  • Deo Alfitra Ramazhoni Department of Physics Education, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
  • Sukardiyono Department of Physics Education, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
  • Heru Kuswanto Department of Physics Education, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
  • Tugirin Department of Physics Education, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71094/vkj.v4i1.305

Keywords:

Physics Education, Learning Motivation, Instructional Methods, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Learning motivation is an important factor influencing students’ conceptual understanding and learning outcomes in physics education. This study aims to synthesize empirical evidence on instructional methods used to enhance students’ motivation to learn physics through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The study follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with articles obtained exclusively from the Scopus database using a Boolean search string. The inclusion criteria comprised empirical research articles published in English between 2020 and 2025 that examined instructional interventions aimed at enhancing students’ motivation to learn physics. Of the 376 articles initially identified, 15 articles met the eligibility criteria following the screening and eligibility assessment processes and were included in the analysis. The synthesis identified four major trends in instructional approaches: technology-enhanced learning, student-centered learning, contextual and culturally responsive learning, and reflective or metacognitive learning. Learning motivation was assessed through indicators such as learning engagement, self-efficacy, situational interest, curiosity, intrinsic motivation, and positive attitudes toward physics. Overall, the findings indicate that learning approaches integrating active student participation, educational technology, meaningful learning experiences, and relevant contexts are more effective in enhancing students’ motivation to learn physics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arega, A., Asfaw, M., & Alemu, T. (2025). Constructivist instructional approaches in science education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 13(1), e70040. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70040

Abraham, J., & Barker, K. (2023). Students’ Perceptions of a “Feminised” Physics Curriculum. Research in Science Education, 53(6), 1163–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10128-3

Álvarez-Siordia, F. M., Merino-Soto, C., Rosas-Meléndez, S. A., Pérez-Díaz, M., & Chans, G. M. (2025). Simulators as an Innovative Strategy in the Teaching of Physics in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 15(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020131

American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. (2019, November 21). Justice served: Case closed for over 40 dogfighting victims. https://www.aspca.org/news/justice-served-case-closed-over-40-dogfighting-victims

Aththibby, A. R., Yogyakarta, U. N., Kuswanto, H., Yogyakarta, U. N., Mundilarto, M., Yogyakarta, U. N., Prihandono, E., Metro, U. M., Planning, H. E., & Board, C. (2021). Cypriot Journal of Educational laboratory-based learning model. 16(5), 2292–2299.

Babalola, F. E., Lambourne, R. J., & Swithenby, S. J. (2020). The Real Aims that Shape the Teaching of Practical Physics in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(2), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09962-7

Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2024). Digital transformation in higher education teaching and learning: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(2), 845–872.

Brakhage, H., Gröschner, A., Gläser-Zikuda, M., & Hagenauer, G. (2023). Fostering Students’ Situational Interest in Physics: Results from a Classroom-Based Intervention Study. Research in Science Education, 53(5), 993–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10120-x

Büyükbayraktar, F. N., & Dilber, R. (2022). Teaching of Magnetism Unit Topics Via Active Learning Applications. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 286–311. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.140.9.6

Dessie, E., Gebeyehu, D., & Eshetu, F. (2024). Motivation, conceptual understanding, and critical thinking as correlates and predictors of metacognition in introductory physics. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290114

Dziob, D., Górska, U., Kołodziej, T., & Čepič, M. (2022). Physics competition to inspire learning and improve soft skills: a case of the Chain Experiment. In International Journal of Technology and Design Education 32(1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09620-y

Erceg, N., Jelovica, L., Mešić, V., Nešić, L., Poljančić Beljan, I., & Nikolaus, P. (2023). Causes of the Shortage of Physics Teachers in Croatia. Education Sciences, 13(8), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080788

Ermakan, N. A., Ualikhanova, B. S., Rakhashev, B. K., & Ramazanova, S. A. (2024). Effectiveness of the Gamification Method in the Process of Phenomenon-Based Learning in Secondary School (in the Example of Kazakhstan). Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 1330–1344. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4814

González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Hsu, Y. S., Lin, S. S., & Yang, K. K. (2023). Recent trends in science education research: A systematic review of teaching innovations. International Journal of Science Education, 45(8), 1015–1036

Jiménez-Valverde, G., Heras-Paniagua, C., Fabre-Mitjans, N., & Calafell-Subirà, G. (2024). Gamifying Teacher Education with FantasyClass: Effects on Attitudes towards Physics and Chemistry among Preservice Primary Teachers. Education Sciences, 14(8), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080822

Moro, K. C. H., & Billote, W. J. S. M. (2023). Integrating Ivatan Indigenous Games to Learning Module in Physics: Its Effect to Student Understanding, Motivation, Attitude, and Scientific Sublime. In Science Education International, 34(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v34.i1.1

Mrani, C. A., El Hajjami, A., & El Khattabi, K. (2020). Effects of the integration of PhET simulations in the teaching and learning of the physical sciences of common core (Morocco). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 3014–3025. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080730

Richter, K., & Kickmeier-Rust, M. (2025). Gamification in Physics Education: Play Your Way to Better Learning. International Journal of Serious Games, 12(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v12i1.858

Sappaile, B. I., Djukri, D., & Wilujeng, I. (2024). Student-centered learning in science education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(1), 35–51.

White, R. L., Bennie, A., Vasconcellos, D., Cinelli, R., Hilland, T., Owen, K. B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Self-determination theory in physical education: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 103247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103247

Whitcomb, K. M., Maries, A., & Singh, C. (2023). Progression in Self-Efficacy, Interest, Identity, Sense of Belonging, Perceived Recognition and Effectiveness of Peer Interaction of Physics Majors and Comparison with Non-Majors and Ph.D. Students. In Research in Science Education (Vol. 53, Issue 3, pp. 525–539). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10068-4

Zhou, X., Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2025). Applying self-determination theory to student motivation in physical education: A systematic review. Retos, 69, 1123–1136.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-12

How to Cite

Ramazhoni, D. A., Sukardiyono, Kuswanto, H., & Tugirin. (2026). A Systematic Literature Review of Motivation in Physics Education. Varied Knowledge Journal, 4(1), 486–499. https://doi.org/10.71094/vkj.v4i1.305